Blog
Guides
Guides and comparisons on autonomous penetration testing, agentic security, and AI red teaming.
Guides
AI Red Teaming: Both Meanings Explained
AI red teaming has two meanings: adversarial testing of AI systems like LLM apps, and using AI agents to perform offensive security. This guide covers both.
OWASP LLM Top 10 Testing: A Practical Guide
OWASP LLM Top 10 testing means dynamically probing LLM apps for prompt injection, insecure output handling, excessive agency, and more. How to test each.
Penetration Testing Guide: Types, Process, and Cost
This penetration testing guide covers what a pentest is, the main types, the process phases, real cost ranges, and how to choose the right approach.
What Is Agentic Security
Agentic security applies AI agents that plan, use tools, and act autonomously to security work, from offensive testing to SOC triage and remediation.
What Is Autonomous Penetration Testing
Autonomous penetration testing uses AI agents to find, exploit, and prove security vulnerabilities without human operators driving every step of the test.
Solutions
Continuous Penetration Testing for Modern CI/CD Pipelines
Continuous penetration testing runs proof-based exploit checks on every deploy, closing the gap that annual pentests leave in fast-moving environments.
LLM Security Testing for AI Applications
LLM security testing sends adversarial payloads at your running AI application to find prompt injection, jailbreaks, and data exfiltration before attackers do.
Comparisons
Sekura vs traditional vulnerability scanners
How Sekura differs from SAST/SCA/DAST scanners: scanners output ranked potential issues; Sekura reports only what it has actually exploited. Side-by-side comparison across output, false positives, scope, cadence, and triage burden.
Sekura vs manual penetration testing
How Sekura differs from a human pentester: manual pentests are point-in-time, $30k–$150k per cycle, take weeks; Sekura runs continuously across the whole attack surface and updates as your environment changes. Comparison and hybrid recommendation.
Alternatives
Cobalt Pentest Alternative: Continuous Autonomous Testing With Sekura
Weighing a Cobalt pentest alternative? Compare continuous autonomous testing from Sekura with Cobalt's human pentest-as-a-service platform.
Horizon3 NodeZero Alternative: Sekura for Application-Layer Pentesting
Evaluating a Horizon3 NodeZero alternative? See how Sekura's proof-first application pentesting compares on scope, deployment, and pricing.
Pentera Alternative: Sekura for Proof-First Application Security
Considering a Pentera alternative? Compare Sekura's proof-of-exploit application testing with Pentera's network-centric security validation.
XBOW Alternative: Sekura for Proof-First Autonomous Pentesting
Looking for an XBOW alternative? Compare Sekura and XBOW on proof of exploit, surfaces covered, deployment control, and public pricing.