Scan free

Solution

Continuous Penetration Testing for Modern CI/CD Pipelines

Continuous penetration testing runs proof-based exploit checks on every deploy, closing the gap that annual pentests leave in fast-moving environments.

All guides →
Sekura — owl-in-shield mark

Continuous penetration testing is the practice of running exploit-driven security tests against your application on every change instead of once a year. Each push triggers an automated pentest that attempts real exploitation and reports only proven findings. It replaces the point-in-time snapshot of an annual engagement with security coverage that moves at the same speed as your code.

Why annual pentests leave coverage gaps

An annual pentest tests your application as it existed during one testing window. It does not test anything you ship afterward.

The math is not subtle. If your team deploys once per working day, an annual test covers one state out of roughly 250. Every other state reaches production untested. The report you hand your customers describes an application that no longer exists.

What changes between engagements:

  1. New endpoints and features ship weekly.
  2. Dependency upgrades pull in new CVEs.
  3. Infrastructure and IAM policies drift.
  4. Third-party integrations add new trust boundaries.

A pentest report ages the way a screenshot ages. It was accurate at the moment it was taken. Our penetration testing guide covers how traditional engagements are scoped and why the window is so narrow.

How continuous penetration testing works in CI/CD

Continuous penetration testing attaches to the same trigger as your test suite: a push.

sequenceDiagram participant Dev as Developer participant GH as GitHub Actions participant Scan as Pentest pipeline participant PR as Pull request Dev->>GH: git push GH->>Scan: workflow triggers scan Scan->>Scan: recon, analysis, exploitation Scan->>GH: SARIF into code scanning Scan->>PR: findings as review comments PR-->>Dev: proof-of-exploit to reproduce

Three properties matter here:

  1. The scan runs on every push, so coverage tracks deploy frequency instead of budget cycles.
  2. Results arrive as SARIF in GitHub code scanning, so findings live next to the code that caused them.
  3. Findings surface as PR comments before merge, which is the cheapest possible moment to fix them.

This is the working definition of autonomous penetration testing: the testing loop runs without a human scheduling it.

The cost math

A manual engagement costs $30,000 to $150,000 and covers one snapshot. Buying two per year doubles the cost and still leaves you tested on two days out of 365.

Continuous pricing works differently. Sekura's self-serve plans run from $20 a month for a solo developer, to $100 a month, to $300 a month for daily testing, with the enterprise tiers arranged by contacting us. The first scan is free, and a one-off Scan Once is $199.

The unit that matters is cost per tested deploy. A team that deploys 500 times a year on the $300 a month ScanPro plan pays about $7 per tested deploy. A single $60,000 manual engagement spread over the same year buys one tested state and 499 untested ones.

What continuous testing does not replace

Automated exploitation is systematic, not creative. That is a real limitation, and vendors who deny it should worry you.

A skilled human tester finds business-logic flaws that automated pipelines hunt poorly: abusing a refund flow, chaining a coupon system into free product, walking an approval workflow backwards. These bugs live in your business rules, not in known vulnerability classes.

I think the honest recommendation is hybrid. Run continuous automated testing as your always-on baseline, and bring in human testers periodically for creative, business-logic-focused work. Our manual pentest comparison covers where each approach is stronger.

Where Sekura fits

Sekura runs a 7-phase multi-agent pipeline on every scan: white-box SAST with 7 engines, recon with more than 50 Kali tools, crypto-agility and post-quantum review, vulnerability analysis with 16 concurrent agents, exploitation with 16 exploit agents producing evidence-only proofs, exploit-chain analysis, and reporting with CVSS v3.1 scores and SARIF output.

Every reported finding carries a deterministic proof-of-exploit. If we cannot exploit it, we do not report it. Scans run inside your own GitHub Actions runner, or entirely behind your firewall on the enterprise plan.

What Sekura does not do: social engineering, physical testing, or the creative business-logic work described above. We are the continuous baseline, not a replacement for every human engagement. Plans and the free first scan are listed on pricing.

Security coverage should be a property of your pipeline, not an event on your calendar.

Frequently asked questions

What is continuous penetration testing?
Continuous penetration testing runs automated, exploit-driven security tests against your application on every change instead of once a year. Each push triggers a scan that attempts real exploitation and reports only proven findings. Coverage tracks your deploy frequency rather than your budget cycle.
How is continuous penetration testing different from vulnerability scanning?
A vulnerability scanner reports things that might be exploitable and leaves triage to you. Continuous penetration testing attempts actual exploitation and reports only findings backed by a working proof-of-exploit. The output is a short list of confirmed problems, not a long list of possibilities.
Does continuous penetration testing replace an annual manual pentest?
Not entirely. Automated testing is systematic but not creative, so business-logic flaws like refund abuse or workflow manipulation still need human testers. The strong pattern is continuous automated testing as a baseline plus a periodic human engagement for creative depth.
How much does continuous penetration testing cost?
Manual engagements typically cost $30,000 to $150,000 each and cover one point in time. Continuous platforms charge a subscription instead. Sekura's self-serve plans run from $20 a month for a solo developer to $300 a month for daily testing, with a free first scan and enterprise tiers arranged by contacting us.
How does continuous pentesting integrate with CI/CD?
The scan triggers on push from your CI system, the same way your test suite does. Results return as SARIF files into GitHub code scanning and as pull request comments, so findings appear in code review before merge. No separate portal or scheduling step is required.